SpruceRunRd./605 over Spruce Run
Map
Coordinates:
+37.26595, -80.5930237°15'57" N, 80°35'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SpruceRunRd./605 over Spruce Run |
Structure number: | 000000000008403 |
Location: | 0.25-Rte609;0.10-Rte610 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 175 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.8 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $12,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 175 | 77.8 |
July 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 175 | 77.8 |
July 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 175 | 77.8 |
July 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 175 | 77.8 |
July 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 175 | 77.8 |
August 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 214 | 80.8 |
July 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 213 | 15.0 |
July 2005 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 163 | 45.4 |
August 2004 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 160 | 45.4 |
July 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 160 | 47.4 |
July 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 249 | 47.8 |
July 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 245 | 47.8 |
August 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 251 | 47.8 |
July 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 251 | 55.8 |
July 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 244 | 55.8 |
July 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 89 | 72.8 |
October 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 205 | 55.8 |
September 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 205 | 53.0 |
October 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 205 | 53.0 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 128 | 53.0 |
September 1991 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 118 | 50.4 |
September 1990 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 231 | 50.4 |