FLAT HOLLOW RD/670 over BIG WALKER CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+37.16228, -80.85952
37°09'44" N, 80°51'34" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	FLAT HOLLOW RD/670 over BIG WALKER CREEK
Structure number:	000000000008471
Location:	1.00-RT 669; 0.05-RT 667
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	128.0 ft. `[39.0 m]`
Total length:	158.5 ft. `[48.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	13.1 ft. `[4.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	14.1 ft. `[4.3 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	13.8 ft. `[4.2 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1936
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod `[6]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	227 `[as of 2014]`
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	34.4
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,980,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
March 2018	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	227	34.4
March 2017	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	227	34.4
March 2016	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	227	34.4
March 2015	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Good	227	19.5
June 2014	Fair	Excellent	Fair	Good	197	24.0
March 2013	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	197	0.0
March 2012	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	197	0.0
March 2011	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	197	0.0
March 2010	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	197	0.0
February 2009	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	197	0.0
March 2007	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	136	0.0
February 2006	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	136	23.8
February 2004	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	136	23.8
February 2002	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	116	23.8
March 2001	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	116	23.8
February 2000	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	116	45.9
March 1999	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Very Good	116	45.9
April 1998	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	116	41.9
June 1997	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	80	42.0
July 1996	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	116	41.9
May 1995	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Very Good	116	44.0
May 1994	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Very Good	101	44.0
April 1993	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	101	41.9
March 1992	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	101	31.2
March 1991	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	57	31.3