Share: 
River Rd 682 over Jordan Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+36.70021, -79.93324
36°42'01" N, 79°55'60" W
+36.70021, -79.93324
36°42'01" N, 79°55'60" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | River Rd 682 over Jordan Creek |
| Structure number: | 000000000010152 |
| Location: | 0.05-Rte701; 0.20-Rte744 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
| Total length: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1965 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 219 [as of 2014] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 52.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $7,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 219 | 52.8 |
| November 2017 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 219 | 52.8 |
| November 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 219 | 52.8 |
| November 2015 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 219 | 52.8 |
| November 2014 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 242 | 62.8 |
| November 2013 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 242 | 74.9 |
| November 2011 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 242 | 74.9 |
| November 2010 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 242 | 71.9 |
| November 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 242 | 73.9 |
| January 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 300 | 65.9 |
| November 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 300 | 63.9 |
| December 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 300 | 63.9 |
| December 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 282 | 63.9 |
| December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 282 | 62.9 |
| January 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 291 | 62.9 |
| February 1995 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 230 | 62.9 |
| February 1993 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 230 | 62.9 |
| December 1990 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 230 | 66.4 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1576700
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1576700