Mayo Landing Rd699 over North Mayo River


+36.61627, -80.03338
36°36'59" N, 80°02'00" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Mayo Landing Rd699 over North Mayo River
Structure number:000000000010171
Location:0.12-Rte58; 0.05-end Main
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:52.5 ft. [16.0 m]
Total length:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:67.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,037,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017FairGoodFairFair667.0
August 2015FairVery GoodFairFair667.0
August 2013FairExcellentSatisfactoryFair867.0
August 2012FairExcellentSatisfactoryFair847.7
April 2011FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory856.7
April 2010FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory856.7
April 2009FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory856.5
May 2008FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory859.5
May 2007FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory859.5
April 2006FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory759.5
May 2005FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory759.5
May 2004FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory756.5
April 2003FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory756.5
May 2002FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory756.5
June 2001FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory756.5
April 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory757.5
April 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory757.5
April 1998FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory757.5
July 1997FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory757.5
June 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3557.5
July 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3557.5
July 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3555.8
July 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3555.8
June 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3564.6
June 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3664.6