Share: 
Elm Avenue over Branch of Beaver Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+38.02012, -78.00575
38°01'12" N, 78°00'21" W
+38.02012, -78.00575
38°01'12" N, 78°00'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Elm Avenue over Branch of Beaver Creek |
| Structure number: | 000000000011439 |
| Location: | .39 From 22 & .22 To 630 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1979 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,194 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 93.6 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3194 | 93.6 |
| August 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3194 | 93.6 |
| August 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4734 | 91.9 |
| August 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4734 | 91.9 |
| August 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4734 | 91.9 |
| August 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4438 | 92.2 |
| August 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4146 | 92.5 |
| August 2003 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 3769 | 92.9 |
| August 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3556 | 93.2 |
| August 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3600 | 93.1 |
| August 1997 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5400 | 91.2 |
| August 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5900 | 90.8 |
| August 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4193 | 92.6 |
| August 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2850 | 94.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1577233
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1577233