Cales Drive over North Anna River
Map
Coordinates:
+38.12214, -77.9847238°07'20" N, 77°59'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Cales Drive over North Anna River |
Structure number: | 000000000011520 |
Location: | Louisa/Orange Co Line |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Total length: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2002 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 161 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 161 | 90.0 |
October 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 161 | 90.0 |
October 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 169 | 90.0 |
October 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 169 | 90.0 |
October 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 169 | 90.0 |
October 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 169 | 90.0 |
October 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 169 | 90.0 |
October 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 73 | 97.0 |
October 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 73 | 97.0 |
July 2001 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 73 | 21.3 |
July 2000 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 73 | 21.3 |
July 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 73 | 21.3 |
July 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 119 | 21.2 |
July 1997 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 119 | 21.2 |
July 1996 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 119 | 21.2 |
July 1995 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 119 | 21.2 |
July 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 119 | 21.2 |
November 1993 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 119 | 21.2 |
July 1992 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 21.2 |
July 1991 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 21.2 |