Share:

MODEST CREEK ROAD over MODEST CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+37.05342, -78.18685
37°03'12" N, 78°11'13" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MODEST CREEK ROAD over MODEST CREEK
Structure number:000000000011656
Location:2.1 FR 49 & 1.4 TO 626
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:57 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:35.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$148,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2017FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory5735.9
September 2016FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory5735.9
September 2015FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory5735.9
September 2014FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory3335.9
September 2013FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory3355.5
September 2012FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3365.5
September 2011FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3365.5
September 2010FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3366.5
September 2009FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3366.1
September 2008FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood3367.1
September 2007FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood4267.1
September 2006FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood4267.1
September 2005FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood4267.1
September 2004FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood8167.1
September 2003FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood8168.1
September 2002GoodVery GoodGoodGood8168.1
September 2001GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good7769.1
September 2000GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good7769.1
September 1999GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good7769.1
September 1998GoodExcellentGoodVery Good3369.1
March 1997FairSatisfactoryFairFair3345.1
March 1996FairSatisfactoryFairFair3345.1
March 1995FairGoodGoodFair3345.1
March 1994FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory6554.1
March 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good6554.1
March 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4753.4