CARTERSVILLE ROAD over DEEP CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+37.60429, -77.99983
37°36'15" N, 77°59'59" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CARTERSVILLE ROAD over DEEP CREEK
Structure number:	000000000013863
Location:	2.63 Fr 715 & 0.94 To 600
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Collector (Rural) `[08]`
Length of largest span:	75.1 ft. `[22.9 m]`
Total length:	131.9 ft. `[40.2 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	23.0 ft. `[7.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1935
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	860 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	27.5
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$100,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
December 2018	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	860	27.5
December 2017	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	801	25.5
December 2015	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	801	25.5
December 2014	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	739	29.2
December 2013	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	739	29.2
December 2012	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	739	29.2
December 2011	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	739	38.1
December 2010	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	739	38.1
December 2009	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	739	38.1
January 2009	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	810	34.8
January 2008	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	751	34.9
January 2007	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	733	17.4
January 2006	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	675	22.0
January 2005	Poor	Good	Poor	Good	662	22.1
January 2004	Poor	Good	Poor	Good	643	22.2
January 2003	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	680	22.0
March 2001	Poor	Good	Poor	Good	682	22.0
April 2000	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	643	22.2
April 1999	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	643	20.9
April 1998	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	625	21.0
April 1997	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Very Good	625	48.6
April 1996	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	625	38.2
April 1995	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	625	37.7
April 1994	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	473	40.0
April 1993	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	473	40.0
April 1992	Fair	Good	Fair	Very Good	473	52.6