Rudasil Mill Road over White Walnut Run


+38.62868, -78.17385
38°37'43" N, 78°10'26" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Rudasil Mill Road over White Walnut Run
Structure number:000000000014703
Location:1.53 Fr 522 & 1.63 To 620
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Total length:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Skew angle:18°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1932
Year reconstructed:2013
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:225 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$5,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201577.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-225
December 201377.8GoodVery GoodExcellentGood-237
October 201232.9PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD237
October 201132.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD237
October 201032.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD237
October 200932.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD237
October 200832.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD237
October 200732.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD237
October 200632.9PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD180
October 200532.9PoorGoodPoorFairSD180
October 200432.9PoorGoodPoorFairSD180
October 200347.5PoorGoodPoorFairSD180
October 200160.6FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO180
October 199960.7FairGoodFairFairFO134
October 199860.7FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO134
October 199760.7FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO134
October 199660.7FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO134
November 199560.7FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO134
November 199460.7FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO134
October 199375.7FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO134
October 199275.7FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO116
September 199177.8FairVery GoodFairSatisfactory-80