Share:

PAXTON DRIVE over CALFPASTURE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+37.98533, -79.49439
37°59'07" N, 79°29'40" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PAXTON DRIVE over CALFPASTURE RIVER
Structure number:000000000015686
Location:0.37 TO END & 0.03 TO 39
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:131.9 ft. [40.2 m]
Total length:265.4 ft. [80.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Skew angle:33°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1890
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for other load-capacity restriction [R]
Average daily traffic:132 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:50.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$5,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2018GoodGoodGoodVery Good13250.2
July 2017GoodGoodGoodVery Good13250.2
July 2016GoodGoodGoodVery Good13251.7
July 2015GoodGoodGoodVery Good13251.7
July 2014GoodGoodGoodVery Good13851.6
July 2013GoodGoodGoodVery Good13851.6
July 2012GoodGoodGoodVery Good13851.6
July 2011GoodGoodGoodVery Good13851.6
July 2010GoodGoodGoodVery Good13851.6
July 2009GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good13851.6
July 2008GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good13851.6
July 2007GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5570.2
July 2006GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5570.2
July 2005GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5570.2
August 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5570.2
July 2003GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5570.2
July 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5570.2
November 2000PoorGoodPoorFair5523.8
December 1999PoorGoodPoorFair5527.2
November 1998PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair5527.2
November 1997PoorGoodPoorFair5527.2
November 1996PoorGoodPoorFair7027.2
March 1996PoorGoodPoorFair7027.2
December 1994PoorGoodPoorFair7027.2
November 1993PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair7027.2
August 1992PoorGoodPoorFair15925.0
February 1991PoorGoodPoorFair7027.2