EAST MAIN STREET over NF HOLSTON RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+36.89066, -81.7495436°53'26" N, 81°44'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | EAST MAIN STREET over NF HOLSTON RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000017502 |
Location: | 1.13ECL.SALTV;2.24WASH.CL |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
Total length: | 190.0 ft. [57.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1957 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,477 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 50.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $176,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2477 | 50.6 |
June 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2477 | 50.6 |
June 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2748 | 50.6 |
August 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2748 | 50.6 |
June 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2748 | 50.6 |
June 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2748 | 50.6 |
June 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2744 | 50.6 |
May 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 2687 | 38.0 |
May 2005 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 2726 | 33.9 |
June 2004 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 2944 | 33.9 |
June 2003 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 2949 | 33.9 |
May 2002 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 2917 | 33.9 |
June 2001 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 4501 | 38.0 |
July 2000 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 3189 | 38.0 |
July 1999 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 3189 | 38.0 |
September 1998 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 3100 | 30.5 |
August 1997 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 3100 | 28.5 |
August 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 3700 | 30.5 |
August 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 3101 | 46.5 |
July 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 1420 | 54.4 |