RIDGE RD. over TIDES MILL STREAM

Map

Coordinates:
+38.27281, -76.99696
38°16'22" N, 76°59'49" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RIDGE RD. over TIDES MILL STREAM
Structure number:	000000000019223
Location:	0.2M COL.BEACH-3.5M K.GEO
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Arterial (Rural) `[06]`
Length of largest span:	42.0 ft. `[12.8 m]`
Total length:	51.8 ft. `[15.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	22.6 ft. `[6.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.2 ft. `[9.8 m]`
Skew angle:	45°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1933
Year reconstructed:	2013
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Main span design:	Arch - Deck `[11]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	4,673 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	69.7
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$650,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2017	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	4673	69.7
May 2015	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	4673	69.7
May 2013	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	4396	70.4
March 2013	Good	Excellent	Very Good	Very Good	4396	70.4
May 2011	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4396	29.2
May 2010	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4396	29.2
May 2009	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4396	29.2
May 2008	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4584	29.2
May 2007	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4412	29.2
May 2006	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4315	29.2
May 2005	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4276	29.2
May 2004	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4732	34.9
May 2003	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4636	34.9
June 2002	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4609	34.9
May 2001	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	4672	34.9
May 2000	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5658	34.9
July 1999	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5658	34.9
June 1998	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5500	34.9
May 1997	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5500	34.9
June 1996	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	5500	35.9
May 1995	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	5500	48.9
June 1994	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	5500	49.9
May 1993	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	5654	49.9
June 1992	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	4415	51.0
June 1991	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	4465	50.9