WINTER HARBOUR RD. over POPES CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.16272, -76.9419238°09'46" N, 76°56'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WINTER HARBOUR RD. over POPES CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000019239 |
Location: | 0.1M RTE3-0.1M RTE654 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Total length: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1944 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 96 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $200,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 96 | 59.7 |
May 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 96 | 59.7 |
May 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 96 | 59.7 |
May 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 96 | 61.0 |
May 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 61.0 |
May 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 59.7 |
May 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 59.7 |
May 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 59.7 |
May 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 59.7 |
May 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 59.7 |
May 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 95 | 59.7 |
May 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 55 | 59.7 |
May 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 55 | 59.7 |
May 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 55 | 59.7 |
May 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 59 | 60.8 |
June 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 59 | 60.8 |
May 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 84 | 72.8 |
June 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 84 | 72.8 |
June 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 84 | 72.8 |
May 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 84 | 72.8 |
May 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 84 | 72.8 |
June 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 99 | 72.8 |
May 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 64 | 72.8 |