+37.76167, -80.00167
37°45'42" N, 80°00'06" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:000000000020149
Location:1.06 TO 64 & .71 TO 18
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Total length:269.0 ft. [82.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,601 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:74.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$5,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201674.7FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3601
December 201474.7FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3601
December 201278.3FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-2000
December 201079.3FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-2000
January 200979.3FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-2000
March 200779.3FairFairSatisfactoryGood-2000
March 200580.3FairFairSatisfactoryGood-2000
February 200362.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-2000
March 200162.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-2000
February 199962.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-2000
January 199762.2GoodGoodGoodGood-2000
February 199562.2GoodGoodGoodGood-2000
July 19919.8PoorPoorSeriousFairSD2000
October 199048.8PoorPoorFairFairSD2000