Share: 
John Randolf Blvd. over Reedy Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+36.70497, -78.88871
36°42'18" N, 78°53'19" W
+36.70497, -78.88871
36°42'18" N, 78°53'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | John Randolf Blvd. over Reedy Creek |
| Structure number: | 000000000021788 |
| Location: | .40-Ham.Bld./.50-Rt.304 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1938 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,064 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 72.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,284,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 12064 | 72.4 |
| February 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 12064 | 72.4 |
| February 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 12146 | 71.4 |
| February 2011 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 10397 | 72.6 |
| February 2009 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 10397 | 72.6 |
| September 2007 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 12272 | 83.6 |
| September 2005 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 12112 | 83.6 |
| November 2003 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 13149 | 83.5 |
| September 2001 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 17347 | 83.0 |
| May 1999 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 8200 | 83.0 |
| May 1997 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 8200 | 83.0 |
| May 1995 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 7900 | 83.0 |
| February 1993 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 8610 | 83.0 |
| March 1991 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 8610 | 83.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 350 | 285 | 0 | 65 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1582268
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1582268