Rolling Hill Road over Cub Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+37.17826, -78.74475
37°10'42" N, 78°44'41" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	Rolling Hill Road over Cub Creek
Structure number:	000000000024514
Location:	0.70 - 664 / 2.50 - 701
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Collector (Rural) `[08]`
Length of largest span:	40.0 ft. `[12.2 m]`
Total length:	140.4 ft. `[42.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	23.0 ft. `[7.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1996
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Number of main spans:	4
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	440 `[as of 2014]`
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	76.7
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$1,420,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
October 2017	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	440	76.7
October 2015	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	440	76.7
October 2014	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	440	79.7
October 2013	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	440	75.2
October 2012	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	440	75.2
October 2011	Good	Good	Good	Good	440	75.2
October 2010	Good	Good	Good	Good	440	75.2
October 2009	Good	Good	Good	Good	427	75.2
November 2008	Good	Good	Good	Good	427	75.2
October 2007	Good	Good	Good	Good	427	75.2
October 2006	Good	Good	Good	Good	427	75.2
December 2005	Good	Good	Good	Good	427	75.2
January 2005	Good	Good	Good	Good	427	75.2
December 2003	Good	Good	Good	Good	331	75.3
November 2002	Good	Good	Good	Good	331	74.3
December 2001	Good	Good	Good	Good	331	72.3
November 2000	Good	Good	Good	Good	331	72.3
December 1999	Good	Good	Good	Good	331	72.3
November 1998	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	281	72.3
November 1997	Good	Good	Good	Very Good	675	72.0
March 1996	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	233	74.8