Share: 
WADESVILLE RD over TRIB OPEQUON CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.23364, -78.03264
39°14'01" N, 78°01'58" W
+39.23364, -78.03264
39°14'01" N, 78°01'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | WADESVILLE RD over TRIB OPEQUON CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000026159 |
| Location: | 0.80 TO 761 - 0.90 TO 672 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1999 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 318 [as of 2014] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 96.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 318 | 96.9 |
| August 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 318 | 96.9 |
| August 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 311 | 99.9 |
| August 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 311 | 99.9 |
| August 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 311 | 99.9 |
| August 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 311 | 99.9 |
| September 2005 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 311 | 100.0 |
| September 2003 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 201 | 100.0 |
| September 2001 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 201 | 100.0 |
| September 1999 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 201 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1584350
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1584350