Share:

WADESVILLE RD over TRIB OPEQUON CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+39.23772, -78.03460
39°14'16" N, 78°02'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:WADESVILLE RD over TRIB OPEQUON CREEK
Structure number:000000000026160
Location:0.60 TO 672 - 1.25 TO 761
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:318 [as of 2014]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.9

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
August 201594.9Good8 out of 10-318
August 201397.9Good8 out of 10-311
August 201197.9Good8 out of 10-311
August 200997.9Good8 out of 10-311
August 200797.9Good8 out of 10-311
September 200598.0Good8 out of 10-311
September 200398.0Good8 out of 10-201
September 200198.0Good8 out of 10-201
September 199998.0Good9 out of 10-201