POCAHONTAS PKY WBL over JAMES RIVER & I-95 & RMP
Map
Coordinates:
+37.44423, -77.4323637°26'39" N, 77°25'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | POCAHONTAS PKY WBL over JAMES RIVER & I-95 & RMP |
Structure number: | 000000000027294 |
Location: | HENRICO/CHESTERFIELD CL |
Purpose: | Carries highway overpass over highway and waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Tolls: | Yes, on toll road [2] |
Length of largest span: | 672.9 ft. [205.1 m] |
Total length: | 4767.3 ft. [1453.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 47.2 ft. [14.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 74.2 ft. [22.6 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 18.7 ft. [5.7 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 144.4 ft. [44.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2002 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Segmental box girder [21] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,554 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 89.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7554 | 89.1 |
September 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7554 | 89.1 |
September 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3549 | 90.6 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3549 | 90.6 |
September 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3549 | 90.6 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3549 | 90.6 |
September 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3549 | 91.7 |
September 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3014 | 91.0 |
September 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6500 | 86.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 7,762 | 7,545 | 103 | 114 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 353,713 | 336,027 | 17,686 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 353,713 | 0 | 353,713 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 15 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 194 | 186 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 157 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 1,030 | 1,030 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 312 | 312 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Pot Bearing | each | 60 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 9,534 | 9,534 | 0 | 0 | 0 |