Share:

SUMMIT POINT RD over LONG MARSH RUN

Map

Coordinates:
+39.19602, -77.96323
39°11'46" N, 77°57'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SUMMIT POINT RD over LONG MARSH RUN
Structure number:000000000027644
Location:0.65 TO 639 - 1.05 TO 654
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,714 [as of 2014]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:76.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$51,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
June 2017Good8 out of 10171476.2
June 2015Good8 out of 10171478.2
June 2013Good8 out of 10197378.0
June 2011Good8 out of 10197378.0
July 2009Good8 out of 10197379.0
June 2007Good8 out of 10186279.1
July 2005Good8 out of 10140380.0
July 2003Good8 out of 1093458.5