Share:

SUMMIT POINT RD over LONG MARSH RUN

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.19667, -77.96333
39°11'48" N, 77°57'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SUMMIT POINT RD over LONG MARSH RUN
Structure number:000000000027644
Location:0.65 TO 639 - 1.05 TO 654
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,714 [as of 2014]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:78.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$51,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
June 201578.2Good8 out of 10FO1714
June 201378.0Good8 out of 10FO1973
June 201178.0Good8 out of 10FO1973
July 200979.0Good8 out of 10FO1973
June 200779.1Good8 out of 10-1862
July 200580.0Good8 out of 10-1403
July 200358.5Good8 out of 10-934