Share:

C3027 over POTASH BROOK

Map

Coordinates:
+43.98224, -73.32773
43°58'56" N, 73°19'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:C3027 over POTASH BROOK
Structure number:100102002401021
Location:0.5 MI TO JCT W CL3 TH28
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1919
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:16.8 tons [15.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:56.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$290,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201656.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-200
August 201468.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-200
August 201264.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodSD200
June 201064.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodSD200
June 200864.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodSD200
June 200643.6PoorFairPoorGoodSD200
June 200445.4PoorFairPoorGoodSD200
April 200245.4PoorFairPoorGoodSD200
June 200045.4PoorFairPoorSatisfactorySD200
July 199857.3FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-200
October 199643.6PoorFairPoorFairSD200
December 199440.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD200
July 199255.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-200
November 199059.1FairFairFairFair-150