+43.94633, -72.92233
43°56'47" N, 72°55'20" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:C3002 over HANCOCK BR. WHITE R.
Structure number:100108000801081
Location:0.6 MI TO JCT W VT125
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:67.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$223,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201667.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-100
August 201467.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-100
July 201267.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-100
July 201067.2GoodVery GoodGoodGood-100
August 200867.2GoodVery GoodGoodGood-100
July 200667.5GoodVery GoodGoodGood-100
July 200465.5GoodVery GoodGoodGood-100
October 200265.5GoodVery GoodGoodGood-100
May 200065.5GoodVery GoodGoodGood-100
June 199867.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-100
May 199667.5FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-100
July 199466.2GoodGoodVery GoodGood-100
June 199266.2GoodGoodGoodGood-100
July 199066.2GoodGoodGoodGood-100