Share:

C3037 over MILL BROOK

Map

Coordinates:
+43.45515, -72.51632
43°27'19" N, 72°30'59" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:C3037 over MILL BROOK
Structure number:101422003414221
Location:0.06 MI TO JCT W VT44
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:10.5 ft. [3.2 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1890
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Arch - Thru [12]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Sufficiency rating:27.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$405,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5027.2
September 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5027.2
September 2013GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood5029.2
May 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5029.2
May 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5029.2
June 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5029.2
May 2005GoodGoodGoodGood5056.6
April 2003GoodGoodGoodGood5056.6
July 2001GoodGoodGoodGood5056.6
May 1999GoodGoodGoodGood5029.2
August 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodGood5029.2
November 1995FairFairFairGood5018.5
November 1993FairFairFairGood5018.5
July 1991FairGoodFairGood5019.6