IRR BIA RTE 6 over WEST FORK SAN POIL RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+48.45624, -118.8017548°27'22" N, 118°48'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | IRR BIA RTE 6 over WEST FORK SAN POIL RIVER |
Structure number: | 00000000000P312 |
Location: | 11 KM S.W. OF REPUBLIC |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 52.5 ft. [16.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Owner: | Bureau of Indian Affairs [62] |
Year built: | 1962 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $50,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 79.8 |
November 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 79.8 |
August 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 300 | 69.4 |
September 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 300 | 69.4 |
September 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 300 | 69.2 |
May 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 300 | 68.2 |
October 2001 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 68.2 |
October 1998 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 71.2 |
June 1997 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 68.4 |
September 1994 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 300 | 67.2 |