SR 3 over GOLDSBOROUGH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+47.20922, -123.1008147°12'33" N, 123°06'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 3 over GOLDSBOROUGH CREEK |
Structure number: | 0000729A0000000 |
Location: | 2.4 N JCT US 101 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Total length: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1923 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Thru [12] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 16,787 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 62.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,049,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 16787 | 62.1 |
May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 16787 | 61.8 |
May 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 17065 | 52.3 |
May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 17065 | 51.3 |
June 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 17872 | 51.1 |
September 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 18538 | 50.0 |
September 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 18538 | 50.0 |
December 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 18538 | 50.0 |
April 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 18538 | 50.0 |
June 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 18538 | 50.0 |
April 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 20500 | 47.7 |
March 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 20500 | 42.2 |
September 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 12250 | 43.5 |
May 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 12250 | 45.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,368 | 1,288 | 80 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,368 | 0 | 1,368 | 0 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 114 | 104 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Floor Beam | linear ft. | 150 | 107 | 42 | 1 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 67 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 |