US 101 over HOQUIAM RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.97537, -123.8733446°58'31" N, 123°52'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 101 over HOQUIAM RIVER |
Structure number: | 0001084A0000000 |
Location: | 3.3 N JCT US 12 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 200.1 ft. [61.0 m] |
Total length: | 1980.1 ft. [603.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 98.4 ft. [30.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1928 |
Year reconstructed: | 1948 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,984 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place but in a deteriorated condition [3] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 47.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $29,304,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 12984 | 47.1 |
May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 12984 | 46.8 |
May 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 13199 | 46.7 |
May 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 13199 | 45.7 |
May 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | - | 13697 | 2.0 |
September 2007 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7880 | 2.0 |
August 2005 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 7880 | 3.0 |
April 2004 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7880 | 2.0 |
July 2003 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7880 | 2.0 |
October 2002 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7880 | 2.0 |
October 2001 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7880 | 25.2 |
October 2000 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7802 | 25.2 |
October 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 7802 | 24.5 |
June 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 7802 | 41.5 |
October 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 7802 | 41.5 |
March 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 7802 | 41.9 |
August 1994 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 7802 | 25.3 |
November 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 12303 | 23.5 |
July 1992 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 12303 | 23.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 96 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 384 | 369 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
Steel Stringer | linear ft. | 4,015 | 3,915 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 25,763 | 0 | 0 | 23,187 | 2,576 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 5,948 | 5,910 | 10 | 0 | 28 |
Superstructure |
Steel Truss | linear ft. | 1,010 | 73 | 0 | 937 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 64,809 | 0 | 0 | 58,328 | 6,481 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 782 | 697 | 0 | 85 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 5,017 | 0 | 0 | 4,516 | 501 |
Reinforced Concrete Floor Beam | linear ft. | 420 | 420 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 35,360 | 35,360 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Steel Gusset Plate | each | 124 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 17 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 109 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 11 |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Timber Column | each | 406 | 397 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 290 | 284 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 2,430 | 2,428 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pier Cap | linear ft. | 2,280 | 1,553 | 712 | 15 | 0 |
Deck |
Open Grid Deck | sq. ft. | 4,010 | 3,998 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Concrete Filled Grid Deck | sq. ft. | 352 | 352 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 220 | 0 | 216 | 0 | 4 |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 260 | 0 | 220 | 20 | 20 |
Assembly without Seal Joint | linear ft. | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Movable Bearing | each | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Enclosed/Concealed Bearing | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,032 | 1,002 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 2,924 | 2,923 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 35,360 | 35,359 | 0 | 1 | 0 |