SR 536 over SKAGIT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+48.42167, -122.3413348°25'18" N, 122°20'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 536 over SKAGIT RIVER |
Structure number: | 0004400A0000000 |
Location: | 4.7 E JCT SR 20 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 160.1 ft. [48.8 m] |
Total length: | 674.9 ft. [205.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.8 ft. [10.6 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1953 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Movable - Swing [17] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Epoxy Overlay [5] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 19,045 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place but in a deteriorated condition [3] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $8,100,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19045 | 59.3 |
June 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19045 | 59.0 |
June 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19045 | 57.2 |
June 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 21941 | 54.9 |
October 2009 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Good | 21484 | 53.9 |
May 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 59.2 |
July 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 58.4 |
July 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 58.4 |
November 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 53.6 |
December 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 53.6 |
August 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 57.4 |
November 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 57.4 |
June 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 54.0 |
April 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 54.0 |
February 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 54.0 |
December 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 19928 | 54.0 |
June 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 17250 | 54.6 |
June 1992 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Good | 17250 | 49.0 |