SPRING ST over I-5
Map
Coordinates:
+47.60811, -122.3304947°36'29" N, 122°19'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | SPRING ST over I-5 |
Structure number: | 0007110D0000000 |
Location: | 1.1 N JCT I-90 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 116.1 ft. [35.4 m] |
Total length: | 278.9 ft. [85.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 57.7 ft. [17.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,000 [as of 2002] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Operating rating: | 41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $6,473,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
April 2017 | 76.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 4000 |
April 2015 | 76.1 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 4000 |
October 2013 | 76.1 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 4000 |
October 2011 | 76.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 3000 |
October 2009 | 76.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 3000 |
November 2007 | 76.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 3000 |
October 2005 | 76.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 3000 |
December 2003 | 64.9 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 3000 |
November 2001 | 64.9 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 3000 |
September 1999 | 64.5 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 4500 |
June 1997 | 64.5 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 4500 |
June 1995 | 86.2 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | FO | 4500 |
June 1993 | 88.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | - | 4395 |
October 1991 | 78.2 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | - | 4395 |