Share:

RAMP TO I-5 NB/SB over CITY STS, RAMP & RR

Map

Coordinates:
+47.54874, -122.31480
47°32'55" N, 122°18'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:RAMP TO I-5 NB/SB over CITY STS, RAMP & RR
Structure number:0007882A0000000
Location:3.8 N JCT SR 900
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Total length:938.0 ft. [285.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,190 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:55.9 tons [50.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:67.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$17,259,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201767.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19190
May 201566.9FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19190
May 201366.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19843
June 201166.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19843
June 200966.9FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19002
June 200770.2FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10960
July 200570.2FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10960
May 200367.2FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10960
September 200167.2FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10960
September 199965.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO19510
March 199765.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO19510
November 199567.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO19510
June 199371.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9830
April 199171.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9830