US 395 SB over N-N RAMP


+47.10709, -118.39976
47°06'26" N, 118°23'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 395 SB over N-N RAMP
Structure number:0014601B0000000
Location:13.0 N JCT SR 21
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:256.9 ft. [78.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,218 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:29% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:76.8 tons [69.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$4,112,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201699.7FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-3218
October 201499.7FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-3218
October 201299.7FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-3274
October 201099.7FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-3185
October 200899.7FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-3185
October 200699.8GoodGoodGoodGood-2000
September 200499.8GoodGoodGoodGood-2000
July 200285.8GoodGoodGoodGood-2000
June 200085.8GoodGoodGoodGood-2000
October 199883.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-2000
April 199697.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-2000