Share: 
NO DATA ENTERED over SHERMAN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+48.57973, -118.24079
48°34'47" N, 118°14'27" W
+48.57973, -118.24079
48°34'47" N, 118°14'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | NO DATA ENTERED over SHERMAN CREEK |
| Structure number: | 062102000001025 |
| Location: | NO DATA ENTERED |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Owner: | U.S. Forest Service [64] |
| Year built: | 1954 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8 [as of 1995] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Unknown [*] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 60.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 8 | 60.0 |
| August 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 75.0 |
| August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 75.0 |
| July 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 75.0 |
| August 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 74.0 |
| September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 74.0 |
| August 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 74.0 |
| August 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 8 | 75.0 |
| August 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8 | 85.0 |
| July 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8 | 85.0 |
| October 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8 | 85.0 |
| September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 8 | 85.0 |
| November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 50 | 85.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1592298
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1592298