MCMANAMON RD over POTHOLES EAST CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+46.85326, -119.1751246°51'12" N, 119°10'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | MCMANAMON RD over POTHOLES EAST CANAL |
Structure number: | 082589000000000 |
Location: | 00.90 MI N LEE RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 145.0 ft. [44.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 24° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1951 |
Year reconstructed: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 6 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,001 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Operating rating: | 20.9 tons [19.0 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 13.0 tons [11.8 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 9.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $4,712,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
November 2016 | 9.5 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1001 |
November 2015 | 9.5 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1001 |
November 2014 | 9.5 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1001 |
November 2013 | 9.5 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1001 |
November 2012 | 9.5 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1001 |
November 2011 | 9.5 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1001 |
May 2010 | 36.8 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | SD | 1001 |
March 2008 | 32.5 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | SD | 1001 |
June 2007 | 45.9 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | SD | 402 |
December 2005 | 45.9 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | SD | 402 |
December 2004 | 59.6 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 402 |
December 2003 | 59.6 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 402 |
January 2003 | 59.6 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 402 |
May 2001 | 57.9 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 560 |
November 1999 | 55.8 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 560 |
December 1998 | 58.9 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 560 |
October 1997 | 58.9 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 560 |
March 1996 | 58.9 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 560 |
January 1994 | 81.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | - | 560 |
March 1992 | 82.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | - | 560 |