MEADOWBROOK WAY SE over SNOQUALMIE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+47.52667, -121.8123147°31'36" N, 121°48'44" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MEADOWBROOK WAY SE over SNOQUALMIE RIVER |
Structure number: | 084357000000000 |
Location: | 0.7 MI NE OF SR-202 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 220.2 ft. [67.1 m] |
Total length: | 386.2 ft. [117.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Year reconstructed: | 2005 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Closed Grating [4] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,458 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 70.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $8,237,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 2458 | 70.5 |
June 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1458 | 81.9 |
June 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2500 | 81.6 |
June 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2500 | 81.6 |
August 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2490 | 75.6 |
August 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2490 | 75.6 |
November 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2490 | 75.6 |
October 2004 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 2490 | 18.0 |
September 2003 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 2490 | 18.0 |
July 2001 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 1920 | 18.9 |
July 2000 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 1920 | 20.3 |
September 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 2130 | 4.3 |
November 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2417 | 40.3 |
June 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2417 | 40.3 |
July 1995 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2417 | 38.1 |
April 1994 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 2324 | 27.3 |
November 1992 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2324 | 55.9 |
January 1992 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 59.4 |