Share: 
E. MARKET ST. over WISHKAH RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.98500, -123.80500
46°59'06" N, 123°48'18" W
+46.98500, -123.80500
46°59'06" N, 123°48'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | E. MARKET ST. over WISHKAH RIVER |
| Structure number: | 085264000000000 |
| Location: | YOUNG STREET |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 79.1 ft. [24.1 m] |
| Total length: | 304.1 ft. [92.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1956 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 6 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,270 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 30.1 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $4,378,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1270 | 30.1 |
| May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 39.3 |
| July 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 39.3 |
| May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 39.3 |
| June 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 13.7 |
| June 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 13.7 |
| June 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 13.7 |
| August 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 13.7 |
| August 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 13.7 |
| July 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1270 | 13.7 |
| October 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2760 | 61.0 |
| November 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2760 | 61.0 |
| July 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2760 | 58.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1594994
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1594994