Share: 
DUPONT,PROSPECT ST over WHATCOM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+48.75500, -122.48100
48°45'18" N, 122°28'52" W
+48.75500, -122.48100
48°45'18" N, 122°28'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | DUPONT,PROSPECT ST over WHATCOM CREEK |
| Structure number: | 085527000000000 |
| Location: | AT POST OFFICE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 67.9 ft. [20.7 m] |
| Total length: | 67.9 ft. [20.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 51.2 ft. [15.6 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1920 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2002 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Frame [07] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,700 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,251,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8700 | 77.0 |
| April 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8700 | 77.0 |
| April 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8700 | 77.0 |
| April 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8700 | 77.0 |
| July 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8200 | 77.0 |
| April 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8200 | 69.4 |
| July 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8200 | 69.4 |
| November 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 8200 | 44.4 |
| June 1997 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 8200 | 44.4 |
| December 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 10800 | 58.0 |
| November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 10800 | 69.3 |
| November 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 10800 | 81.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 136 | 131 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,448 | 2,448 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1595153
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1595153