Share: 
HALL CREEK RD over HALL CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+48.45791, -118.47001
48°27'28" N, 118°28'12" W
+48.45791, -118.47001
48°27'28" N, 118°28'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | HALL CREEK RD over HALL CREEK |
| Structure number: | 086460000000000 |
| Location: | 13.60 W LYNX CRK RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1999 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 94.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $80,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 94.9 |
| June 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 94.9 |
| June 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 63 | 94.4 |
| June 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 63 | 94.4 |
| June 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 63 | 94.4 |
| April 2007 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 94.8 |
| May 2005 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 94.8 |
| April 2003 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 94.8 |
| October 1999 | Good | N out of 10 | 25 | 93.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1595746
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1595746