Share: 
FR 2169 over PINE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.87398, -88.68573
45°52'26" N, 88°41'09" W
+45.87398, -88.68573
45°52'26" N, 88°41'09" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FR 2169 over PINE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 090602000001012 |
| Location: | 7.3 MI S OF JCT STH 70 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 70.9 ft. [21.6 m] |
| Total length: | 73.2 ft. [22.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Owner: | U.S. Forest Service [64] |
| Year built: | 1982 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 75.0 |
| September 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 75.0 |
| May 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 75.0 |
| May 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 77.8 |
| July 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 97.0 |
| May 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 97.0 |
| June 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 98.0 |
| August 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 100.0 |
| June 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 99.0 |
| June 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 100.0 |
| June 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1596652
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1596652