FR 2186 over WOLF RIVER
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FR 2186 over WOLF RIVER |
Structure number: | 090605000001023 |
Location: | 2.0 MI W OF JCT CTH S |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Total length: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | U.S. Forest Service [64] |
Year built: | 2006 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 80 |
Structural appraisal: | Unknown [*] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $45,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 80 | 100.0 |
September 2016 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 80 | 100.0 |
May 2008 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 80 | 100.0 |
June 2004 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 80 | 40.0 |
August 2002 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 80 | 40.0 |
August 2000 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 80 | 41.0 |