STH 13 over DRYDEN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+46.15695, -90.6218746°09'25" N, 90°37'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | STH 13 over DRYDEN CREEK |
Structure number: | B02004600000000 |
Location: | 1.7M N JCT CTH D |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1997 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,100 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2100 | 84.8 |
October 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2100 | 84.8 |
May 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2000 | 86.7 |
May 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2300 | 86.1 |
May 2010 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2500 | 79.0 |
May 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2500 | 79.0 |
May 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2320 | 79.0 |
June 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2320 | 79.0 |
July 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2320 | 79.0 |
July 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2300 | 79.0 |
June 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2360 | 79.0 |
July 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2360 | 79.0 |
May 1995 | - | - | - | - | 2360 | 79.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,484 | 1,463 | 0 | 21 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 131 | 97 | 30 | 4 | 0 |