Share: 
CTH A over TOWNSEND CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+46.62315, -91.38527
46°37'23" N, 91°23'07" W
+46.62315, -91.38527
46°37'23" N, 91°23'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CTH A over TOWNSEND CREEK |
| Structure number: | B04002600000000 |
| Location: | 1.3M N JCT CTH B |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 7.9 ft. [2.4 m] |
| Total length: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
| Skew angle: | 17° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1978 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 872 [as of 2015] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 98.8 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 872 | 98.8 |
| August 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 872 | 98.8 |
| August 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 98.8 |
| August 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| August 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| August 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| August 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| August 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| September 2002 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| October 2000 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| October 1998 | Good | N out of 10 | 800 | 96.8 |
| June 1996 | Good | N out of 10 | 350 | 96.9 |
| November 1994 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 350 | 96.9 |
| July 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 350 | 96.9 |
| May 1990 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 350 | 96.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1596930
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1596930