Share:

LRD ROSE VALLEY RO over ROSE VALLEY CREEK

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LRD ROSE VALLEY RO over ROSE VALLEY CREEK
Structure number:B06015500000000
Location:1.6M E OF JCT CTH N
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:52 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.9

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201694.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-52
October 201494.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
October 201291.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
October 201091.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
November 200891.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
December 200791.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
October 200691.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
February 200491.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-50
200091.9-----50