Share: 
STH 114 over N BR MANITOWOC RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+44.14012, -88.18571
44°08'24" N, 88°11'09" W
+44.14012, -88.18571
44°08'24" N, 88°11'09" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | STH 114 over N BR MANITOWOC RIVER |
| Structure number: | B08001900000000 |
| Location: | 0.9M E JCT CTH BB |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
| Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1991 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,700 [as of 2018] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 93.6 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 3700 | 93.6 |
| February 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 3700 | 93.6 |
| February 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| February 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| February 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| February 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| February 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| February 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| September 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| December 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| December 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| November 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| September 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| December 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| October 1993 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| October 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
| October 1991 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 9560 | 85.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1597602
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1597602