Share:

USH 12/18 EB-W BEL over CTH MC (JOHN NOLEN DR.)

Map

Coordinates:
+43.04284, -89.37027
43°02'34" N, 89°22'13" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:USH 12/18 EB-W BEL over CTH MC (JOHN NOLEN DR.)
Structure number:B13003700000000
Location:1.3M E JCT USH 151 TO N
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:145.0 ft. [44.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:70.2 ft. [21.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1952
Year reconstructed:1962
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:55,900 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$907,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2017FairGoodGoodSatisfactory5590096.0
October 2015FairGoodGoodSatisfactory5590096.0
October 2013FairGoodGoodSatisfactory5590095.0
October 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5590095.0
October 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5350096.0
October 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5350096.0
October 2005GoodGoodGoodGood9720096.0
October 2003GoodGoodGoodGood9720096.0
October 2001GoodGoodGoodGood9720096.0
November 1999GoodGoodGoodGood9720094.0
August 1998GoodGoodGoodGood9720094.0
October 1997GoodGoodGoodGood9720094.0
December 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood9720094.0
November 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9720098.0
December 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9720098.0
December 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2353098.0
October 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2353098.0
February 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2353098.0

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.10,1799,93024900
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach1871100
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.1731601300
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.2021831360
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.327321420