Share:

LRD MAPLEWOOD ROAD over STONEY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+44.74108, -87.45550
44°44'28" N, 87°27'20" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LRD MAPLEWOOD ROAD over STONEY CREEK
Structure number:B15001300000000
Location:0.2M E JCT CTH O
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Total length:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1 [as of 2015]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:100.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
September 2016Good7 out of 101100.0
September 2014Good7 out of 101100.0
September 2012Good7 out of 10198.0
September 2010Good7 out of 10197.0
October 2008Good7 out of 10197.0
October 2006Good7 out of 10197.0
September 2004Good7 out of 10197.0
August 2002Good7 out of 10-97.0
December 1998Good8 out of 10-97.0