CTH N over LITTLE POPPLE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.79264, -88.1950345°47'34" N, 88°11'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CTH N over LITTLE POPPLE RIVER |
Structure number: | B19001200000000 |
Location: | 4.0M N JCT CTH B |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 128.0 ft. [39.0 m] |
Total length: | 131.9 ft. [40.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1997 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,648 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1648 | 85.5 |
September 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1648 | 85.5 |
September 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1600 | 85.5 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1600 | 84.5 |
September 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 742 | 93.6 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 742 | 93.6 |
September 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 742 | 93.6 |
September 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 742 | 93.6 |
August 2002 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 2000 | 85.3 |
October 2000 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 94.8 |
October 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 94.8 |
January 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 330 | 94.8 |