Share:

STH 55 over N BR PESHTIGO RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+45.68865, -88.86832
45°41'19" N, 88°52'06" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:STH 55 over N BR PESHTIGO RIVER
Structure number:B21000200000000
Location:2.5M N JCT STH 32 TO N
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:84.3 ft. [25.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:1982
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:90.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$428,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017PoorPoorGoodGood20090.8
August 2015FairFairGoodGood30092.2
August 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodGood30095.2
August 2011GoodGoodVery GoodGood30095.9
August 2009GoodGoodVery GoodGood30093.9
August 2007GoodGoodVery GoodGood27094.1
August 2005GoodGoodVery GoodGood27094.1
June 2003GoodGoodVery GoodGood27094.1
October 2001GoodGoodVery GoodGood20094.5
November 1999GoodGoodGoodGood20094.5
May 1998GoodGoodGoodGood20094.5
August 1997GoodGoodGoodGood20094.5
July 1996GoodGoodGoodGood20094.5
July 1995GoodGoodGoodGood20094.5
June 1994GoodGoodGoodGood20094.5
June 1993GoodGoodGoodGood24094.3
July 1992FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory24094.3
August 1991FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory24094.3