CTH G over PESHTIGO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.65278, -88.6353945°39'10" N, 88°38'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CTH G over PESHTIGO RIVER |
Structure number: | B21000700000000 |
Location: | 0.3M S JCT USH 8 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Total length: | 73.8 ft. [22.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 8° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1979 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 629 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 629 | 78.5 |
August 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 629 | 78.5 |
August 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 620 | 78.5 |
August 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | 620 | 89.5 |
September 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | 600 | 89.5 |
September 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 600 | 92.4 |
September 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 600 | 92.4 |
September 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 600 | 92.4 |
August 2002 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 600 | 92.4 |
September 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
October 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
October 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
September 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
September 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
August 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |