Share: 
LRD DICK SAMZ RD over N BR PESHTIGO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.67292, -88.81867
45°40'23" N, 88°49'07" W
+45.67292, -88.81867
45°40'23" N, 88°49'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | LRD DICK SAMZ RD over N BR PESHTIGO RIVER |
| Structure number: | B21000900000000 |
| Location: | 1.7M N JCT CTH G |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 5.6 ft. [1.7 m] |
| Total length: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 60° |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1982 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 60 [as of 2015] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 81.4 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2018 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 60 | 81.4 |
| August 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 60 | 81.4 |
| August 2014 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 60 | 92.4 |
| August 2012 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 60 | 91.4 |
| September 2010 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 53 | 92.4 |
| September 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 53 | 92.4 |
| September 2006 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 53 | 92.4 |
| September 2004 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 53 | 92.4 |
| September 2000 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 20 | 92.5 |
| 2000 | - | N out of 10 | 53 | 92.4 |
| October 1998 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 20 | 92.5 |
| October 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 20 | 92.5 |
| September 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 20 | 92.5 |
| September 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 20 | 92.5 |
| August 1990 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 20 | 92.5 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1599771
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1599771