CTH M over SWAMP CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.47922, -88.9979445°28'45" N, 88°59'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CTH M over SWAMP CREEK |
Structure number: | B21001900000000 |
Location: | 0.8M W JCT STH 55 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Total length: | 63.0 ft. [19.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 182 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 182 | 99.8 |
August 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 182 | 99.8 |
August 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 180 | 97.8 |
August 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 180 | 97.8 |
September 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 150 | 97.9 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 150 | 97.9 |
September 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 150 | 97.9 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 150 | 97.9 |
August 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 150 | 97.9 |
September 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 150 | 97.8 |
October 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 150 | 97.8 |