STH 181 NB-N 76TH over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV


+43.11499, -88.00591
43°06'54" N, 88°00'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:STH 181 NB-N 76TH over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV
Structure number:B40025600000000
Location:1.4M N JCT USH 41
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:84.6 ft. [25.8 m]
Total length:291.4 ft. [88.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,250 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:57.5 tons [52.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,232,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201661.2PoorPoorFairFairSD13250
July 201461.2PoorPoorFairFairSD13250
July 201261.5FairFairFairFairFO10350
July 201075.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO14810
July 200875.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO14810
June 200675.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO14810
July 200475.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO14810
July 200275.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO14810
June 200073.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17700
July 199970.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO37100
June 199870.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO37100
October 199670.7GoodGoodGoodGoodFO37100
March 199573.6GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO37100
April 199473.6GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO37100
July 199375.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO16900
November 199275.6FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO16900
March 199128.3PoorPoorVery GoodSeriousSD16900